ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The emergence of drug resistance is one of the main problems concerning malaria treatment. The use of counterfeit and/or substandard antimalarial drugs can contribute to the development of parasite resistance. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of antimalarial drugs distributed in Brazil. METHODS: Samples containing chloroquine phosphate, mefloquine hydrochloride, primaquine phosphate, and quinine sulfate tablets were delivered to the Rio de Janeiro central storeroom (CENADI), state storerooms (SS), and Basic Health Units (BHUs) in the north region of Brazil - a total of 10 sample sets. After 5 months of storage, the samples were collected, and in vitro quality control analyses according to official and published methods were performed. RESULTS: Inadequate drug storage conditions were found in two SS and in all BHUs evaluated. There were no quality deviations found in the chloroquine samples. The quinine samples exhibited weight variation above the allowed limits. The primaquine samples were found to have packaging deficiency. The release of mefloquine in samples from some regions showed a statistically significant difference when compared with the CENADI samples. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to periodically evaluate the quality and storage conditions of essential drugs. The quality deviations found with the primaquine and quinine samples are not related to storage conditions and must be addressed urgently. The decreased mefloquine release from tablets is related to formulation problems or influenced by inadequate storage conditions, prompting further investigation. Even with the mentioned problems, the samples would probably not contribute to resistant parasite selection.
INTRODUÇÃO: O aparecimento de resistência aos medicamentos é um dos maiores problemas do tratamento da malária. O uso de medicamentos falsos e/ou de má qualidade pode contribuir para o desenvolvimento de resistência no parasita. Este estudo tem por objetivo avaliar a qualidade dos medicamentos antimaláricos distribuídos no Brasil. MÉTODOS: Amostras contendo comprimidos de difosfato de cloroquina, cloridrato de mefloquina, difosfato de primaquina e sulfato de quinina foram enviadas ao almoxarifado central na Cidade do Rio de Janeiro (CENADI), almoxarifados estaduais (SS) e Unidades Básicas de Saúde (UBS) nos estados da região norte do Brasil, totalizando dez amostras. Após cinco meses de armazenamento, as amostras foram coletadas e analisadas segundo métodos oficiais e da literatura. RESULTADOS: Foram encontradas condições inadequadas de armazenamento de medicamentos em duas SS e em todas as UBS avaliadas. Não foram encontrados problemas de qualidade com as amostras de cloroquina. As amostras de quinina apresentaram variação de peso acima dos limites permitidos. Amostras de primaquina foram encontradas com problemas na embalagem. A cedência de mefloquina de comprimidos, em algumas regiões, apresentou diferença estatisticamente significativa quando comparada com a amostra do CENADI. CONCLUSÕES: É importante avaliar, periodicamente, a qualidade e as condições de armazenamento de medicamentos essenciais. Desvios de qualidade encontrados com as amostras de primaquina e quinina não estão relacionados às condições de armazenamento e devem ser corrigidos urgentemente. O decréscimo na cedência de mefloquina dos comprimidos está relacionado com a formulação ou foi influenciada por condições de armazenamento inadequadas, necessitando de uma investigação posterior. Apesar dos problemas mencionados, as amostras provavelmente não contribuiriam para a seleção de parasitas resistentes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Antimalarials/standards , Drug Storage/standards , Drugs, Essential/standards , Brazil , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Chloroquine/standards , Mefloquine/standards , Primaquine/standards , Quality Control , Quinine/standardsABSTRACT
A ineficácia clínica de muitos medicamentos tem servido de alerta para estudos mais profundos sobre os componentes da formulação, processos empregados e características físico-químicas dos fármacos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a liberação in vitro de comprimidos de fosfato de primaquina disponíveis no Brasil para tratamento da malária, e o desenvolvimento de novas formulações de liberação convencional. Embora os comprimidos de fosfato de primaquina estudados tenham sido aprovados pelos critérios propostos pela Farmacopéia Americana (2006) para o teste de dissolução, não apresentaram desempenho adequado para o perfil de dissolução, mostrando retenção do fármaco durante a liberação. Os resultados indicam a existência de problemas nos comprimidos de fosfato de primaquina analisados, podendo sugerir como um dos fatores responsáveis pelo aparecimento de resistência dos parasitas.
The clinical inefficacy of many medications has served to highlight the need for deeper studies on the formulation components, processes used and physicochemical characteristics of drugs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro release of primaquine phosphate from tablets available in Brazil for treating malaria, and the development of new formulations for conventional release. Although the primaquine phosphate tablets studied had been approved according to the criteria proposed by the United States Pharmacopoeia (2006) for the dissolution test, they did not present adequate dissolution performance characteristics, in that there was drug retention during the release process. The results indicate the existence of problems in the primaquine phosphate tablets analyzed, and it may suggest that this is one of the factors responsible for the appearance of parasite resistance.
Subject(s)
Humans , Antimalarials/chemistry , Primaquine/chemistry , Area Under Curve , Antimalarials/standards , Brazil , Calorimetry, Differential Scanning , Malaria/drug therapy , Primaquine/standards , Reference Standards , Solubility , Tablets/chemistry , Tablets/standardsABSTRACT
Substandard and counterfeit pharmaceutical products, including antimalarial drugs, appear to be widespread internationally and affect both the developing and developed countries. The aim of the study was to investigate the quality of antimalarial drugs, ie, artesunate (ART), chloroquine (CHL), mefloquine (MEF), quinine (QUI), sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (S/P) and tetracycline (TT) obtained from the government sector and private pharmacies in 4 Thai provinces: Mae Hong Son, Kanchanaburi, Ranong, and Chanthaburi. Three hundred sixty-nine samples of 6 antimalarial drugs from 27 government hospitals, 27 malaria clinics, and 53 drugstores, were collected. Drug quality was assessed by simple disintegration test and semi-quantitative thin-layer chromatography in each province; 10% passed, 100% failed and doubtful samples were sent to be verified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at the Thai National Drug Analysis Laboratory, (NL). Fifteen point four percent of ART, 11.1% of CHL and 29.4% of QUI were substandard. Based on the finding, drug regulatory authorities in the country took appropriate action against violators to ensure that antimalarial drugs consumed by malaria patients are of good quality.